Dr. Joe Fawcett: Masks-Vaccines-Social Distancing

0
327

MASKS – VACCINES – SOCIAL DISTANCING

The following life-changing health information IS NOT for the weak of faith

Had your slap in the face today?  No? Well then, here’s three hard wake-up slaps for you:

I’m going to be brutally blunt with you regarding three strikingly present day (right now) molten-hot “health” topics: (ONE) Masks, (TWO) Vaccines, and (THREE) Social Distancing.

In a nutshell here’s my educated, researched, observed, experienced take on them: AVOID (slap), AVOID (slap), AVOID (slap)… IF you value your life and the life of your loved ones… AVOID at all costs getting ANY kind of a vaccine just because “government” and “medical health experts” told you to do so. AVOID ever wearing any kind of a mask just because “government” and “medical health experts” told you to do so. And DO NOT AVOID social distancing yourself from anywhere but mostly your church, friends, loved ones and even strangers.

There Is No Correlation Between Masks, Lockdowns And COVID-19 Suppression

Is your left cheek red hot swollen yet? Good. Now read on…

SLAP ONE – MASKS

If you’ve fallen for the demonically, cowardly, planned scam of wearing a mask, then you are at a huge risk of falling for any kind of “life-saving” mandatory VACCINE.

The critical problem is that if you succumb to the hysteria hype of wearing a mask and social distancing then more than likely you will surrender yourself and your loved ones to get “the” vaccine. You are the sheeple being prepared to be eaten by the ravenous wolves.

But the more serious problem is that you are at an even greater risk of contracting some dramatic, expensive, life-robbing, frightening physical and emotional side effects from a “Bill Gates” mandatory vaccine that will spill into the realm of horrific spiritual consequences.

NOTE: For those of you who don’t want to read any further and just want to cut to the chase about the absolute foolishness of wearing a mask… go to this highly informative site

For those of you who will or who have visited that site and are not suffering from having your sacred health beliefs challenged or from cognitive dissonance (look it up) … then READ ON:

1. Are Masks Effective?
A meta-analysis found that face masks had no detectable effect against transmission of viral infections. (1) It found: “Compared to no masks, there was no reduction of influenza-like illness cases or influenza for masks in the general population, nor in healthcare workers.”
This 2020 meta-analysis found that evidence from randomized controlled trials of face masks did not support a substantial effect on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza, either when worn by infected persons (source control) or by persons in the general community to reduce their susceptibility. (2)
Another recent review found that masks had no effect specifically against Covid-19, although facemask use seemed linked to, in 3 of 31 studies, “very slightly reduced” odds of developing influenza-like illness. (3)
This 2019 study of 2,862 participants showed that both N95 respirators and surgical masks “resulted in no significant difference in the incidence of laboratory confirmed influenza.” (4)
This 2016 meta-analysis found that both randomized controlled trials and observational studies of N95 respirators and surgical masks used by healthcare workers did not show benefit against transmission of acute respiratory infections. It was also found that acute respiratory infection transmission “may have occurred via contamination of provided respiratory protective equipment during storage and reuse of masks and respirators throughout the workday.” (5)
A 2011 meta-analysis of 17 studies regarding masks and effect on transmission of influenza found that “none of the studies established a conclusive relationship between mask/respirator use and protection against influenza infection.” (6) However, authors speculated that effectiveness of masks may be linked to early, consistent, and correct usage.
Face mask use was likewise found to be not protective against the common cold, compared to controls without face masks among healthcare workers. (7)

Airflow around masks
Masks have been assumed to be effective in obstructing forward travel of viral particles. Considering those positioned next to or behind a mask wearer, there have been farther transmission of virus-laden fluid particles from masked individuals than from unmasked individuals, by means of “several leakage jets, including intense backward and downwards jets that may present major hazards,” and a “potentially dangerous leakage jet of up to several meters.” (8) All masks were thought to reduce forward airflow by 90% or more over wearing no mask. However, Schlieren imaging showed that both surgical masks and cloth masks had farther brow jets (unfiltered upward airflow past eyebrows) than not wearing any mask at all, 182 mm, and 203 mm respectively, vs nondiscernible with no mask. Backward unfiltered airflow was found to be strong with all masks compared to not masking.
For both N95 and surgical masks, it was found that expelled particles from 0.03 to 1 micron were deflected around the edges of each mask, and that there was measurable penetration of particles through the filter of each mask. (9)

Penetration through masks

A study of 44 mask brands found mean 35.6% penetration (+ 34.7%). Most medical masks had over 20% penetration, while “general masks and handkerchiefs had no protective function in terms of the aerosol filtration efficiency.” The study found that “Medical masks, general masks, and handkerchiefs were found to provide little protection against respiratory aerosols.” (10)
It may be helpful to remember that an aerosol is a colloidal suspension of liquid or solid particles in a gas. In respiration, the relevant aerosol is the suspension of bacterial or viral particles in inhaled or exhaled breath.
In another study, penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%. (11)

N95 respirators
Honeywell is a manufacturer of N95 respirators. These are made with a 0.3-micron filter. (12) N95 respirators are so named, because 95% of particles having a diameter of 0.3 microns are filtered by the mask forward of the wearer, by use of an electrostatic mechanism. Coronaviruses are approximately 0.125 microns in diameter.
This meta-analysis found that N95 respirators did not provide superior protection to facemasks against viral infections or influenza-like infections. (13) This study did find superior protection by N95 respirators when they were fit-tested compared to surgical masks. (14)
This study found that 624 out of 714 people wearing N95 masks left visible gaps when putting on their own masks. (15)

Surgical masks
This study found that surgical masks offered no protection at all against influenza. (16) Another study found that surgical masks had about 85% penetration ratio of aerosolized inactivated influenza particles and about 90% of Staphylococcus aureus bacteria, although S aureus particles were about 6x the diameter of influenza particles. (17)
Use of masks in surgery were found to slightly increase incidence of infection over not masking in a study of 3,088 surgeries. (18) The surgeons’ masks were found to give no protective effect to the patients.
Other studies found no difference in wound infection rates with and without surgical masks. (19) (20)
This study found that “there is a lack of substantial evidence to support claims that face masks protect either patient or surgeon from infectious contamination.” (21)
This study found that medical masks have a wide range of filtration efficiency, with most showing a 30% to 50% efficiency. (22)
Specifically, are surgical masks effective in stopping human transmission of coronaviruses? Both experimental and control groups, masked and unmasked respectively, were found to “not shed detectable virus in respiratory droplets or aerosols.” (23) In that study, they “did not confirm the infectivity of coronavirus” as found in exhaled breath.
A study of aerosol penetration showed that two of the five surgical masks studied had 51% to 89% penetration of polydisperse aerosols. (24)
In another study, that observed subjects while coughing, “neither surgical nor cotton masks effectively filtered SARS-CoV-2 during coughs by infected patients.” And more viral particles were found on the outside than on the inside of masks tested. (25)

Cloth masks
Cloth masks were found to have low efficiency for blocking particles of 0.3 microns and smaller. Aerosol penetration through the various cloth masks examined in this study were between 74 and 90%. Likewise, the filtration efficiency of fabric materials was 3% to 33% (26)
Healthcare workers wearing cloth masks were found to have 13 times the risk of influenza-like illness than those wearing medical masks. (27)
This 1920 analysis of cloth mask use during the 1918 pandemic examines the failure of masks to impede or stop flu transmission at that time, and concluded that the number of layers of fabric required to prevent pathogen penetration would have required a suffocating number of layers, and could not be used for that reason, as well as the problem of leakage vents around the edges of cloth masks. (28)

Masks against Covid-19
The New England Journal of Medicine editorial on the topic of mask use versus Covid-19 assesses the matter as follows, “We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection. Public health authorities define a significant exposure to Covid-19 as face-to-face contact within 6 feet with a patient with symptomatic Covid-19 that is sustained for at least a few minutes (and some say more than 10 minutes or even 20 minutes). The chance of catching Covid-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic.” (29)

2. Are masks safe?
During walking or other exercise
Surgical mask wearers had significantly increased dyspnea after a 6-minute walk than non-mask wearers. (30)
Researchers are concerned about possible burden of facemasks during physical activity on pulmonary, circulatory, and immune systems, due to oxygen reduction and air trapping reducing substantial carbon dioxide exchange. As a result of hypercapnia, there may be cardiac overload, renal overload, and a shift to metabolic acidosis.(31)

Risks of N95 respirators
Pregnant healthcare workers were found to have a loss in volume of oxygen consumption by 13.8% compared to controls when wearing N95 respirators. 17.7% less carbon dioxide was exhaled. (32) Patients with end-stage renal disease were studied during use of N95 respirators. Their partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) decreased significantly compared to controls and increased respiratory adverse effects. (33) 19% of the patients developed various degrees of hypoxemia while wearing the masks.
Healthcare workers’ N95 respirators were measured by personal bioaerosol samplers to harbor influenza virus. (34) And 25% of healthcare workers’ facepiece respirators were found to contain influenza in an emergency department during the 2015 flu season. (35)

Risks of surgical masks
Healthcare workers’ surgical masks also were measured by personal bioaerosol samplers to harbor influenza virus. (36)
Various respiratory pathogens were found on the outer surface of used medical masks, which could result in self-contamination. The risk was found to be higher with longer duration of mask use. (37)
Surgical masks were also found to be a repository of bacterial contamination. The source of the bacteria was determined to be the body surface of the surgeons, rather than the operating room environment. (38) Given that surgeons are gowned from head to foot for surgery, this finding should be especially concerning for laypeople who wear masks. Without the protective garb of surgeons, laypeople generally have even more exposed body surface to serve as a source for bacteria to collect on their masks.

Risks of cloth masks
Healthcare workers wearing cloth masks had significantly higher rates of influenza-like illness after four weeks of continuous on-the-job use, when compared to controls. (39)
The increased rate of infection in mask-wearers may be due to a weakening of immune function during mask use. Surgeons have been found to have lower oxygen saturation after surgeries even as short as 30 minutes. (40) Low oxygen induces hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF-1). (41) This in turn down-regulates CD4+ T-cells. CD4+ T-cells, in turn, are necessary for viral immunity. (42)

REFERENCES

1. T Jefferson, M Jones, et al. Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses. MedRxiv. 2020 Apr 7.https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.30.20047217v2
2. J Xiao, E Shiu, et al. Non pharmaceutical measures for pandemic influenza in non-healthcare settings – personal protective and environmental measures. Centers for Disease Control. 26(5); 2020 May.https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article
3. J Brainard, N Jones, et al. Facemasks and similar barriers to prevent respiratory illness such as COVID19: A rapid systematic review. MedRxiv. 2020 Apr 1.https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.01.20049528v1.full.pdf
4. L Radonovich M Simberkoff, et al. N95 respirators vs medical masks for preventing influenza among health care personnel: a randomized clinic trial. JAMA. 2019 Sep 3. 322(9): 824-833.https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2749214
5. J Smith, C MacDougall. CMAJ. 2016 May 17. 188(8); 567-574.https://www.cmaj.ca/content/188/8/567
6. F bin-Reza, V Lopez, et al. The use of masks and respirators to prevent transmission of influenza: a systematic review of the scientific evidence. 2012 Jul; 6(4): 257-267.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5779801/
7. J Jacobs, S Ohde, et al. Use of surgical face masks to reduce the incidence of the common cold among health care workers in Japan: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Infect Control. 2009 Jun; 37(5): 417-419.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19216002/
8. M Viola, B Peterson, et al. Face coverings, aerosol dispersion and mitigation of virus transmission risk.https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.10720, https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2005/2005.10720.pdf
9. S Grinshpun, H Haruta, et al. Performance of an N95 filtering facepiece particular respirator and a surgical mask during human breathing: two pathways for particle penetration. J Occup Env Hygiene. 2009; 6(10):593-603.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/15459620903120086
10. H Jung, J Kim, et al. Comparison of filtration efficiency and pressure drop in anti-yellow sand masks, quarantine masks, medical masks, general masks, and handkerchiefs. Aerosol Air Qual Res. 2013 Jun. 14:991-1002.https://aaqr.org/articles/aaqr-13-06-oa-0201.pdf
11. C MacIntyre, H Seale, et al. A cluster randomized trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers. BMJ Open. 2015; 5(4)https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577.long
12. N95 masks explained.https://www.honeywell.com/en-us/newsroom/news/2020/03/n95-masks-explained
13. V Offeddu, C Yung, et al. Effectiveness of masks and respirators against infections in healthcare workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Inf Dis. 65(11), 2017 Dec 1; 1934-1942.https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/65/11/1934/4068747
14. C MacIntyre, Q Wang, et al. A cluster randomized clinical trial comparing fit-tested and non-fit-tested N95 respirators to medical masks to prevent respiratory virus infection in health care workers. Influenza J. 2010 Dec 3.https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1750-2659.2011.00198.x?fbclid=IwAR3kRYVYDKb0aR-su9_me9_vY6a8KVR4HZ17J2A_80f_fXUABRQdhQlc8Wo
15. M Walker. Study casts doubt on N95 masks for the public. MedPage Today. 2020 May 20.https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/publichealth/86601
16. C MacIntyre, Q Wang, et al. A cluster randomized clinical trial comparing fit-tested and non-fit-tested N95 respirators to medical masks to prevent respiratory virus infection in health care workers. Influenza J. 2010 Dec 3.https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1750-2659.2011.00198.x?fbclid=IwAR3kRYVYDKb0aR-su9_me9_vY6a8KVR4HZ17J2A_80f_fXUABRQdhQlc8Wo
17. N Shimasaki, A Okaue, et al. Comparison of the filter efficiency of medical nonwoven fabrics against three different microbe aerosols. Biocontrol Sci. 2018; 23(2). 61-69.https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/bio/23/2/23_61/_pdf/-char/en
18. T Tunevall. Postoperative wound infections and surgical face masks: A controlled study. World J Surg. 1991 May; 15: 383-387.https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF01658736
19. N Orr. Is a mask necessary in the operating theatre? Ann Royal Coll Surg Eng 1981: 63: 390-392.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2493952/pdf/annrcse01509-0009.pdf
20. N Mitchell, S Hunt. Surgical face masks in modern operating rooms – a costly and unnecessary ritual? J Hosp Infection. 18(3); 1991 Jul 1. 239-242.https://www.journalofhospitalinfection.com/article/0195-6701(91)90148-2/pdf
21. C DaZhou, P Sivathondan, et al. Unmasking the surgeons: the evidence base behind the use of facemasks in surgery. JR Soc Med. 2015 Jun; 108(6): 223-228.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4480558/
22. L Brosseau, M Sietsema. Commentary: Masks for all for Covid-19 not based on sound data. U Minn Ctr Inf Dis Res Pol. 2020 Apr 1.https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2020/04/commentary-masks-all-covid-19-not-based-sound-data
23. N Leung, D Chu, et al. Respiratory virus shedding in exhaled breath and efficacy of face masks. Nature Research. 2020 Mar 7. 26,676-680 (2020).https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-16836/v1
24. S Rengasamy, B Eimer, et al. Simple respiratory protection – evaluation of the filtration performance of cloth masks and common fabric materials against 20-1000 nm size particles. Ann Occup Hyg. 2010 Oct; 54(7): 789-798.https://academic.oup.com/annweh/article/54/7/789/202744
25. S Bae, M Kim, et al. Effectiveness of surgical and cotton masks in blocking SARS-CoV-2: A controlled comparison in 4 patients. Ann Int Med. 2020 Apr 6.https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-1342
26. S Rengasamy, B Eimer, et al. Simple respiratory protection – evaluation of the filtration performance of cloth masks and common fabric materials against 20-1000 nm size particles. Ann Occup Hyg. 2010 Oct; 54(7): 789-798.https://academic.oup.com/annweh/article/54/7/789/202744
27. C MacIntyre, H Seale, et al. A cluster randomized trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers. BMJ Open. 2015; 5(4)https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577.long
28. W Kellogg. An experimental study of the efficacy of gauze face masks. Am J Pub Health. 1920. 34-42.https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/pdf/10.2105/AJPH.10.1.34
29. M Klompas, C Morris, et al. Universal masking in hospitals in the Covid-19 era. N Eng J Med. 2020; 382 e63.https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2006372
30. E Person, C Lemercier et al. Effect of a surgical mask on six minute walking distance. Rev Mal Respir. 2018 Mar; 35(3):264-268.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29395560/
31. B Chandrasekaran, S Fernandes. Exercise with facemask; are we handling a devil’s sword – a physiological hypothesis. Med Hypothese. 2020 Jun 22. 144:110002.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32590322/
32. P Shuang Ye Tong, A Sugam Kale, et al. Respiratory consequences of N95-type mask usage in pregnant healthcare workers – A controlled clinical study. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2015 Nov 16; 4:48.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26579222/
33. T Kao, K Huang, et al. The physiological impact of wearing an N95 mask during hemodialysis as a precaution against SARS in patients with end-stage renal disease. J Formos Med Assoc. 2004 Aug; 103(8):624-628.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15340662/
34. F Blachere, W Lindsley et al. Assessment of influenza virus exposure and recovery from contaminated surgical masks and N95 respirators. J Viro Methods. 2018 Oct; 260:98-106.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30029810/
35. A Rule, O Apau, et al. Healthcare personnel exposure in an emergency department during influenza season. PLoS One. 2018 Aug 31; 13(8): e0203223.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30169507/
36. F Blachere, W Lindsley et al. Assessment of influenza virus exposure and recovery from contaminated surgical masks and N95 respirators. J Viro Methods. 2018 Oct; 260:98-106.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30029810/
37. A Chughtai, S Stelzer-Braid, et al. Contamination by respiratory viruses on our surface of medical masks used by hospital healthcare workers. BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Jun 3; 19(1): 491.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31159777/
38. L Zhiqing, C Yongyun, et al. J Orthop Translat. 2018 Jun 27; 14:57-62.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30035033/
39. C MacIntyre, H Seale, et al. A cluster randomized trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers. BMJ Open. 2015; 5(4)https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577
40. A Beder, U Buyukkocak, et al. Preliminary report on surgical mask induced deoxygenation during major surgery. Neurocirugia. 2008; 19: 121-126.https://scielo.isciii.es/pdf/neuro/v19n2/3.pdf
41. D Lukashev, B Klebanov, et al. Cutting edge: Hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha and its activation-inducible short isoform negatively regulate functions of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes. J Immunol. 2006 Oct 15; 177(8) 4962-4965.https://www.jimmunol.org/content/177/8/4962
42. A Sant, A McMichael. Revealing the role of CD4+ T-cells in viral immunity. J Exper Med. 2012 Jun 30; 209(8):1391-1395.https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/3420330

Need more fact driven proof? Here ya go…

Mandatory Masks can Cause Considerable Harm and are Not Proven Effective

Evidence that face masks reduce the transmission of viral respiratory infections within community settings is equivocal at best.[4],[5],[6] A recent meta-analysis of scientific literature, including 11 randomized, controlled trials and 10 observational studies, found that there was no clear clinical or laboratory-confirmed evidence that masks prevent infection.[7]

To the contrary, the study warned that facemasks… “may even increase transmission if they act as fomites [objects or materials that are likely to carry infection] or prompt other behaviors that transmit the virus such as face touching.”

This echoes World Health Organization (WHO) guidance published on January 29, 2020 titled, “Advice on the use of masks in the community, during home care and in healthcare settings in the context of the novel coronavirus (‎‎‎‎‎2019-nCoV)‎‎‎‎‎ outbreak.” [8] In it, the WHO says, “Wearing medical masks when not indicated may cause unnecessary cost, procurement burden and create a false sense of security that can lead to neglecting other essential measures such as hand hygiene practices.” Furthermore, the January 2020 WHO guidance stated, “Cloth (e.g., cotton or gauze) masks are not recommended under any circumstance.”

Cloth masks have been found to be particularly problematic,[9],[10],[11] and some masks have raised concerns because they’ve been treated with a registered pesticide.[12],[13] A British Medical Journal (BMJ) study published in April 2020 cautions against the use of cloth masks, citing “Moisture retention, reuse of cloth masks and poor filtration may result in increased risk of infection.”[14] The WHO affirms increased infection risk with cloth masks in its latest June 5, 2020 guidance.[15] It based its guidance on an earlier BMJ study that found the penetration of particles to be 97% in the cloth mask group, with significantly higher rates of infection and influenza-like illness.[16]

A study on the CDC website that reviewed 10 different randomized clinical trials worldwide on highly infectious respiratory virus transmission found “no significant reduction” in “transmission with the use of face masks.”[17]

Given the lack of evidence for their use,[18],[19],[20],[21],[22],[23]and flip-flopping advice both against[24][25]and for their use by authoritative health agencies like the WHO, the increasing pressure to wear masks in public – and to be able to access basic services required to maintain one’s health, liberty and livelihood – constitutes an unnecessary power grab and means of controlling the population.

Fear IS Driving Violence and Aggression

Nonstop media and social media coverage of coronavirus has generated unprecedented levels of fear, panic and anxiety.[26],[27],[28] On June 30, Dr. Anthony Fauci warned lawmakers that we could easily see 100,000 new cases of coronavirus each day.[29],[30] Fauci stated that he is unable to accurately predict the incidence and mortality that the US will eventually see, but he declared, “It’s going to be very disturbing, I will guarantee you that.”[31],[32]

Some individuals are now fraught with so much panic and worry[33] that they are becoming violent toward family members[34] and anyone they believe is a threat to their personal safety. Aggression toward those who don’t wear masks is becoming is increasingly common and ranges from verbal threats, to assault and battery, to murder.

In March, an 86-year-old dementia patient was killed in a Brooklyn emergency room after she lost her bearings and grabbed onto another patient’s IV pole to steady herself.[35]The patient, 32-year-old Cassandra Lundy, became irate that the elderly woman, Janie Marshall, had broken social distancing guidelines and then knocked her to the floor.[36]

Ms. Marshall – who initially went to the ER for severe abdominal pains – struck her head on the floor, lost consciousness and died hours later. According to reports, Ms. Lundy, who has been charged with manslaughter, told detectives that she shoved Ms. Marshall because the elderly woman “got into the defendant’s space.”[37]

The Great Mask Divide

Masks have become one of the most controversial issues of our time.[38],[39],[40] Those who are seen in public without a mask are often judged and discriminated against,[41],[42] even if they have a condition that precludes compliance. Harassment and discrimination have become rampant,[43],[44] and fellow citizens are policing each other with very little to no knowledge of why someone may or may not be wearing a mask.[45],[46]

Even in communities that have mask exceptions for certain members of the population, those individuals are no longer allowed to fully participate in society because businesses are barring them or won’t provide services to them without a mask. It’s a breach of an individual’s privacy and autonomy to not be able to go into public without being discriminated against, and banning people from entering or participating in society because they don’t wear a mask violates their constitutional rights.[47]

These types of breaches have sparked lawsuits nationwide from individuals claiming they have been personally or financially harmed from mandatory mask measures.[48],[49],[50]  Some also contend that forcing people with medical conditions to wear masks violates Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act,[51]which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability of “enjoyment of services, facilities, privileges, advantages or accommodations by any person who … operates a place of public accommodation.”[52]

Individual Health Is the Responsibility of the Individual, Not the State

With unbridled governmental control throughout much of 2020 – under the guise of emergency orders needed to curb coronavirus – citizens from coast to coast have seen their civil, constitutional and religious rights trampled upon.[53],[54] An onslaught of executive orders have shaped nearly every aspect of our personal lives, from where we can go and what activities we’re allowed to engage in, to how we educate our children, to how we earn a living, to how we worship.[55]

They have also dictated which medical philosophies we embrace and which medical treatments we can receive. In doing so, we’ve been extremely restricted in how we’ve been able to care for ourselves and support our immune systems – and we’ve been asked to follow guidelines that are not evidence-based “for the greater good.”

Although the government plays a role in controlling the spread of infectious illness, adults are responsible for their own health;[56] each person has the right to responsibly make choices about what precautions and perceived risks they take. It’s not incumbent on government officials to direct individual health decisions and granting them this power is dangerous. Individuals are much more qualified than public servants to weigh the risks and benefits of their own personal actions.

Public officials should not impose mandates to seek compliance. Mandates perpetuate the idea that individuals lack the moral or intellectual capacity to make sound decisions for themselves and their children, so the state needs to do it for them.[57] Individuals are capable of making responsible decisions,[58] and those decisions must take a person’s whole health into account.

The health of the individual cannot be forsaken or sacrificed for the collective. We can only have a healthy society when that society is made up of healthy individuals.[59] Health is a personal right and responsibility. It is not something that we should look to the government to bestow on us or guarantee. History does repeat itself… think Nazi Germany… it’s rearing it’s demonic head here in the USA.

Masks as “Submission Signaling”

There is no compelling scientific evidence to justify the widespread push to mandate universal mask-wearing.[60] The demonstrated risks[61],[62],[63] far outweigh the purported benefits. Whereas those who wear masks believe they are “virtue signaling” their concern for the weakest and most vulnerable among us, those of us who refuse to submit to authoritarian decrees do so because we believe that health IS a personal responsibility – and that it is up to us to decide what precautionary measures we implement to avoid a virus with an estimated case fatality rate of .1% to .26%.[64]

At-risk populations and those who are sick can easily self-isolate, and society should take the best care of them possible. However, we who are healthy, law-abiding citizens should NOT be forced to take any precaution that can result in physical[65]and emotional harm[66]and that impinges on our constitutional rights; this includes the right to bodily autonomy (option out of vaccines and masks), the right to move about freely, the right to participate in society and connect with others (NO social distancing), and the right to be free from unreasonable government intrusion.[67]

It’s Time to Stand – Urge Your Lawmakers to Make Face Coverings Voluntary

Never before has it been so important for you to stand up for your rights! Mandatory medicine and mandated interventions such as vaccines, social distancing, and mask-wearing have NO place in a free society;[68],[69] citizens have the right to make responsible decisions about what is best for themselves and their children based on their own unique circumstances.

Come voting time, the choices have NEVER been so clear as to vote out every democrat, socialist, communist and RINO on the ballot. If you haven’t started, start NOW to pray to The God of the Bible for the forces of evil who are determined to steal, kill, and destroy us to be defeated at the polling booth. God have mercy upon us.

References

[1]https://www.littler.com/publication-press/publication/facing-your-face-mask-duties-list-statewide-orders

2]https://www.businessinsider.com/coronavirus-the-17-states-requiring-people-to-wear-masks-public-2020-6

[3]https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2020/07/03/covid-face-masks-states-require-public/5371503002/

4]Med Hypotheses. 2020 May 19;143:109855.doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2020.109855. Online ahead of print.

[5]Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jun 24;M20-3213. doi: 10.7326/M20-3213. Online ahead of print.

[6]medRxiv – April 6, 2020

[7]https://www.qeios.com/read/1SC5L4

[8]https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/330987

[9]https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577

[10]Cardiol J. 2020;27(2):218-219. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2020.0054. Epub 2020 Apr 14.

[11]The Epoch Times

[12]https://www.newschannel5.com/news/newschannel-5-investigates/tennessee-governors-free-sock-masks-treated-with-registered-pesticide

[13]https://beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/2020/06/face-masks-that-contain-toxic-pesticide-distributed-in-tennessee-for-coronavirus-then-recalled/

[14]https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4420971/#__ffn_sectitle

[15]https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/advice-on-the-use-of-masks-in-the-community-during-home-care-and-in-healthcare-settings-in-the-context-of-the-novel-coronavirus-(2019-ncov)-outbreak

[16]https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4420971/#__ffn_sectitle

[17]https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article

[18]BMJ April 7, 2020; 369:m1422 doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1422

[19]https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2020/04/commentary-masks-all-covid-19-not-based-sound-data

[20]https://www.infectioncontroltoday.com/view/cloth-masks-are-useless-against-covid-19

[21]American Thinker

[22]https://www.rcreader.com/commentary/masks-dont-work-covid-a-review-of-science-relevant-to-covide-19-social-policy?fbclid=IwAR3XrEyWaRxO8qWOqsySq_wPutL4JGx00FKV5VwL8O8P9X5Z156n_qoWSC8

[23]https://jennifermargulis.net/healthy-people-wearing-masks-during-covid19/

[24]https://www.novushealth.com/2020/04/face-masks-in-a-covid-19-world-to-wear-or-not-to-wear/

[25]Twitter, U.S. Surgeon General, February 29, 2020

[26]Cureus. 2020 May 2;12(5):e7923. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7923.

[27]J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 19;22(5):e19556. doi: 10.2196/19556.

[28]https://qz.com/1812664/the-psychology-of-coronavirus-fear-and-how-to-overcome-it/

[29]https://www.c-span.org/video/?473393-1/covid-19-response-reopening-schools

[30]https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/30/us/politics/fauci-coronavirus.html

[31]https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/30/politics/fauci-redford-testimony-senate-coronavirus/index.html

[32]https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/30/fauci-says-us-coronavirus-outbreak-is-going-to-be-very-disturbing-could-top-100000-cases-a-day.html

[33]Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2020 May 21;20764020925835. doi: 10.1177/0020764020925835.

[34]Psychiatry Res. 2020 Apr 30;289:113046. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113046.

[35]https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/08/nyregion/coronavirus-brooklyn-janie-marshall-cassandra-lundy.html

[36]https://bklyner.com/86-year-old-killed-coronavirus/

[37]https://patch.com/new-york/bed-stuy/social-distancing-death-suspect-held-coronavirus-packed-rikers

[38]BMJ 2020;369:m2005

[39]https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2020/06/controversy-covid-19-mask-study-spotlights-messiness-science-during

[40]https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/think-act-be/202005/why-are-masks-triggering-conflict-and-rage

[41]BMJ 2020;369:m2009

[42]Disability Rights UK June 18, 2020

[43]https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2020/07/01/many-black-and-asian-americans-say-they-have-experienced-discrimination-amid-the-covid-19-outbreak/

[44]https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1143163319383637&set=gm.4087336354647037&type=3&theater

[45]https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/04/us/social-distancing-rules-coronavirus.html

[46]https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/think-act-be/202005/why-are-masks-triggering-conflict-and-rage

[47]Cornell Law

[48]https://www.miamiherald.com/news/coronavirus/article243643797.html

[49]https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/04/us/social-distancing-rules-coronavirus.html

[50]https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavirus-live-updates/2020/07/10/889691823/more-than-20-u-s-states-now-require-face-masks-in-public

[51]https://pittsburgh.cbslocal.com/2020/06/22/lawsuits-against-giant-eagle-mask-policy/

[52]ADA Gov

[53]https://www.aclu.org/news/civil-liberties/civil-liberties-never-sleep-the-aclu-in-the-pandemic/

[54]https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/judge-andrew-napolitano-coronavirus-crisis-constitution

[55]Ballotpedia

[56]https://jennifermargulis.net/science-shows-coronavirus-covid19-treatments-without-masks-lockdowns-isolation/

[57]https://standforhealthfreedom.com/blog/why-states-are-getting-it-wrong-with-medical-mandates/

[58]https://www.mercatus.org/bridge/commentary/beware-government-overreach-protect-our-health

[59]https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/01/5-ways-to-build-healthier-societies/

[60]https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2006372

[61]Neurocirugia (Astur).2008 Apr;19(2):121-6.

[62]Ann Occup Hyg. 2012 Jan;56(1):102-12.doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mer069. Epub 2011 Sep13.

[63]Acta Neurologica Scandinavica February 28, 2006.

[64]https://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMe2002387?articleTools=true

[65]BMJ 2020;369:m2003

[66]BMC Family Practice, 2013; Published online Dec. 24, 2013. DOI:10.1186/1471-2296-14-200.

[67]DanPatrick.org – April 22, 2020.

[68]https://ahrp.org/beware-of-medicine-marching-in-lockstep-with-government-personal-reflections/

[69]https://freedomwire.com/masks-safety-or-control/

SLAP TWO – FORCED VACCINES

I wrote an article, “Meet the devil’s humble vaccine servant” regarding that California nut job Paul Offit. Unfortunately, I didn’t know about the quackery of Bill Gates, Anthony Fauci, and Deborah Birx at the time so whenever you see Pauly, also think Billy, Tony, and Debbie… the unholy trinity.

You need to know that today’s goal of forced vaccination has been in existence for quite some time, going back to the dark “elite” think tanks decades ago and the bloody halls of pharmaceutical companies. Major pharmaceutical companies salivate at the thought of mandated, forced vaccinations because of enormous, obscene profits from the vaccine sales and the treatment of guaranteed resulting diseases, as well as the cover-up of vaccine risks by a population free of a control group, and of course Bill Gates favorite reason: to decimate the undesirable aspects of human population, to totally control those who are chosen not to die, and for him to have ultimate power. Sounds like a demon possessed dude, doesn’t it?

The political left (democrats, socialists, communists, liberals, RINO) are rabidly pushing for mandatory vaccination laws. So, what are YOU going to do about it? Well, as for me I’m going to vote against every one of those demon possessed reprobates AND I’m doing what I can with making sure this kind of wake-up-slap-in-your-face message gets out there. What about you? Other than hopefully praying about it, what are YOU doing about it? Are you going to put your faith and prayers into action?

By the way, have you noticed that the entire vaccine debate can scarcely even be labeled a debate? It’s an exercise in social shaming, shouting down opposing views, religious devotion to television’s fake news (stop watching that hellish crap), and anyone wearing a lab coat or claiming to be an expert on why vaccines are so critical to the welfare of your health.

With the culprit (the devil) behind the recent mandatory vaccine/eliminate exemption push now revealed, it’s time to begin working toward repealing these laws and making sure that no similar bill is ever politically viable.

The reality is that we are all being “punished” for potentially harboring a deadly virus that “needs a vaccine”. Further, we are being punished without trial or even a concrete accusation of wrong doing.  The burden of proof always lies with the accuser (“medical government”), NOT with the punished or accused (you and me). Therefore, to evade a “ruling” or “mandate” that the “punishment” is NOT lawful and is immediately to cease, the accuser must, in this case, prove the following absolutely:

1) That viruses exist.

2) That viruses cause disease.

3) That a virus named Covid-19 exists.

4) That Covid-19 causes severe illness and death.

5) That this disease is highly infectious.

6) That face masks and “social distancing” prevent infection.

7) That sufficiently large numbers of people have become seriously ill and/or succumbed to it so as to warrant extreme measures to control it.

Okay yall, they will, inevitably, fail in this as none of the above can be proven to the required standard (or, in most points, at all). So, here’s the response to each of those seven points:

To 1: Germany’s highest court has already ruled in December 2016 that the existence of viruses (measles) is NOT proven.

To 2: The preponderance of the evidence shows that the protein particles labelled “virus” are much more likely to be exosomes which communicate solutions to sickness and other problems.

To 3: The only evidence for the existence of Covid-19 is a computer model based upon guesswork as to what such a virus might look like. The virus itself has never been found or isolated.

To 4: a) Where a purported cause cannot be found, any claims as to its’ effects are completely bogus.  b) All of the purported deaths are “with” and not “of” Covid-19, i.e. it did NOT cause the disease/death.

To 5: There is NO reliable evidence of transmission from one human to another. To the contrary, studies which have been carried out show that this does NOT take place!

To 6: a) The necessary porosity of the masks to allow breathing enables the “virus” particles to pass through unrestricted.  b) Because these particles are so incredibly tiny, they are essentially weightless and random air currents will carry them for miles and miles. Such particles regularly cross the Pacific in 3 days and the Atlantic in a little more than one day. A distance of six feet is, therefore, seen to be totally meaningless.

To 7: All serious illness and deaths claimed are in people who were already seriously ill and, basically, in the process of dying. In some countries, there was an upswing in deaths caused by the lockdowns denying people essential treatments. Following their deaths which began two weeks after lockdown started, death figures have returned to normal.

So, tell me once again – why aren’t unmasked children in school and why aren’t we back to business as usual? And why do “they” want to vaccinate ALL of us and for WHAT?

I, therefore, demand immediate cessation of all anti-Constitutional punishments (masks, vaccines, social distancing) imposed upon the accused – that’s you and me.

I’m not going to write any more about “vaccines” here, rather I want the intellectually honest to take time to watch these important videos:

Vaccines = Human 2.0?

Vaccines Revealed: The Truth!

Vaccines and Transhumanism

Vaccines? The Mark of the Beast?

Amazing Polly videos such as: Your Body is Their Weapon: We’re All Patients Now, MORE Public Health Mafia Connections, Eyes on Africa, 7-Step Recipe for Creating Vaccine Demand. I learn a lot from her insightful, in-depth research and greatly look forward to her video postings.

Plandemics a two-part must-see documentary revealing the truth behind the Covid-19 scam.

I highly recommend Rob Skiba’s extremely informative biblical approach to Vaccines and the Mark of the Beast. If you were to watch only one video, this is the one.

I highly recommend subscribing to GreenMedInfo. Read their vaccine article, “131 Ways for an Infant to Die“.

If you want to read and have in your library some excellent BOOKS be sure to get Kent Heckenlively’s and Dr. Judy Mikovits, PLAGUE OF CORRUPTION. Also, his INOCULATED: How Science Lost its Soul in Autism. And his THE CASE AGAINST MASKS: Ten Reasons Mask Use Should be Limited.  Kent’s books can be purchased from Amazon.com   You’ll also want to subscribe to his free e-newsletter at www.BolenReport.com Also, subscribe to Patrick Wood’s excellent free e-newsletter regarding Technocracy.

On 8/14/2020 this came from Dr. Judy Mikovits (who is highly vilified by the Marxist Mainstream Media): “The masks in stores and on walks outside and while driving in your car is mind blowing to me. Do you not know how unhealthy it is to keep inhaling your carbon dioxide and restricting proper oxygen flow? I honestly cannot believe how non-logical we have become! We as a society seem to just listen to (perceived) authority without question. I don’t see a whole lot of critical thought happening here, I’m sorry to say. Why I opt NOT to wear a mask. Well, let me break it down for you. The body requires AMPLE amounts of oxygen for optimal immune health. Especially during a so-called “pandemic”. Proper oxygenation of your cells and blood is ESSENTIAL for the body to function as it needs to in order to fight off any illness. Masks will hamper oxygen intake. Unless you are working in a hospital setting, it is NOT necessary. But go ahead and hold onto to your security blanket if it makes you feel better. I do not listen to the government when it tries to instruct me on how to maintain health, nor do I trust their ‘stats’ (which we know are based on unconfirmed numbers). You want to be healthy, then make sure to apply it to all aspects of your life. Stop smoking, change your diet, stop consuming alcohol, turn off your Wi-Fi and cell phone, stop getting injected with neurotoxins, stop taking toxic medications, stop using so many chemicals in your everyday life, practice proper hygiene (WASH YOUR HANDS). Most importantly, go outside and BREATHE DEEPLY, get some sun, drink plenty of (filtered) water, sleep well and learn to LISTEN to your body.”

The absolute best book out there for parents and grandparents to read is from someone I personally know: Childhood Vaccination: Questions All Parents Should Ask

I also highly recommend Jon Rappaport’s daily free e-newsletter by joining his e-mail list. He’s a no-nonsense-in-your-face passionate journalist with a deep understanding of what’s going on with the technology, medical, political et al crazies of this earth and how to bring light on these cockroaches of darkness from his point of view.

Rappaport’s 9/9/2020 fascinating article is about the POLITICS of the COVID vaccine:

The news media are accusing Trump of trying to rush a COVID vaccine into use by November 1, just before the election:  “The president is playing politics.” Suddenly, the press is expressing “deep concern” about the safety and efficacy of the vaccine.  Experts are being trotted out to issue warnings. The White House is saying they would never compromise the safety of the public. The FDA is strenuously insisting their decision to authorize a COVID vaccine will be undertaken with extreme care and will not bow to pressure. Of course, if Obama or Hillary were in the White House now, the press would be praising them for their efforts to move “full speed ahead.” If Trump were now talking about a need to delay the vaccine, in order to “get it right,” the press would be screaming about the necessity of approving a vaccine quickly “to save lives.” As I’ve been writing, the media definition of science is now “the opposite of whatever Trump says.”  The White House definition is whatever the White House says.  The public is caught in the middle.  There are three leading corporate competitors vying for an upcoming COVID vaccine.  One of them is Moderna.  This is a small US company that has never brought a product of any kind to market.  In other words, their credibility is zero.  Yet they’ve garnered half a billion dollars of federal money for research.  The press isn’t screaming about that.  Fauci likes Moderna.  Bill Gates likes Moderna.  Why?  Mostly because Moderna’s vaccine is deploying an experimental RNA technology.  RNA tech never been approved for any product.  In past clinical trials, serious adverse effect have occurred.  But who cares?

RNA vaccine technology allows cheaper, faster, and easier production of vaccines.  That’s the whole point.  IF Moderna’s COVID vaxx can be jammed through the approval process, then all future vaccines can be developed within months, not years. “We’ve just discovered twelve new viruses that are causing human diseases…and we’ll have twelve new vaccines ready to go by Christmas.”  Again, the health of the public is of no concern.  Adverse effects, such as the body attacking itself (RNA technology)?  The permanent alteration of genetic makeup (DNA technology)?  No problem.  Plunge ahead.

There is more.  Two recent developments have cancelled the need for a vaccine, even for those who love vaccines and believe a novel coronavirus a) exists and b) is causing harm:

ONE: The CDC quietly announced that only 6 percent of all official COVID deaths have occurred in cases where the virus was the single factor.  In all other cases, the patients had several prior medical conditions—meaning, in effect, there was no need to invoke a virus to account for their deaths.   (I have explained this in great detail in past articles.  We are talking about the forced premature deaths of the elderly.)

TWO: The New York Times stated the result of a broad study, which showed that up to 90 percent of all COVID cases, based on a positive PCR test, were false positives.  Non-cases.

Combining these two developments, the implication is quite clear: we’re in the middle of a less-than-average “flu season.” No need for any vaccine.  No need for any Tony Fauci.  No need for any Bill Gates.  No need for any CDC or WHO.  It’s over. But as in any war, there are people who don’t get the memo.  They keep fighting and lying and destroying.  They’re war criminals.  In this case, their true intent has nothing to do with the fake pandemic.  They want vast economic destruction leading to a Brave New World.

Here is a backgrounder on that subject.  I (Rappaport) wrote it in March:

Notes on the fall-out from the present unnecessary disaster

This covert op called PANDEMIC is about LOCKDOWNS, economic destruction, and the further pacification of the population. A bereft population more dependent than ever on governments and official authorities.  Long-term, a dazed population gradually guided into a heavily technocratic future—wall to wall surveillance, smart cities, Internet of Things, universal guaranteed income tied to social credit score.  Most importantly: assigned energy quotas for every citizen.  CONTROL.

Social distancing and the suspicion of people directed against each other, owing to possible “infection,” will create a more isolated and atomized society. The tendency for people to think of themselves as eternal medical patients, under doctor’s orders, will be encouraged, non-stop.  Accept diagnoses, take drugs and vaccines.

Governments and their media partners will continue to broadcast warnings about future epidemics and the need for vigilance.  Talking heads will intone, “We have a new normal now.  We’re never going back to the way things were before.  The world of interdependence gives us many benefits, but it also carries dangers…”

As I’ve emphasized, technocracy has the goal of using energy production and consumption as the monitor of our lives.  A voice comes from the wall of the apartment:  “Mr. Smith, this is your Meter Friend, Sam.  Your energy use for the month is nearing its limit.  As you know that use is measurable in real time, and as of the moment, you only have sixteen units left, owing to the large diversion of electricity to medical emergency centers.  We will institute dimming and brownouts in your home, to keep your social credit score stable…”  CONTROL.

What makes this system of measuring the production and use of energy, planet-wide, moment to moment, possible?  The Internet of Things.  And we’re told the technology enabling the IoT is 5G, rolling out now.

Never forget what David Rockefeller, arch Globalist, wrote about China, in 1973, after his agent, Richard Nixon, had worked a “miracle,” opening up trade with the Communist colossus, after 25 years of diplomatic freeze: “Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution [30-60 million killed by their own government], it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in fostering high morale and community of purpose. The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao’s leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history.” (From a China Traveler, NY Times, August 10, 1973.)

China has always been the favored Globalist model—burgeoning corporate capitalism attached to, and embedded in, the center of brutal top-down dictatorship.

Who provided the rationale for the declaration of the pandemic and everything that followed?  The Chinese regime when they suddenly locked down 50 million people in three cities overnight. They broke the ice.  And where did the egregiously phony counting of COVID cases first raise its head in the West?  In Italy, where a national lockdown was declared.  Italy, floating on Chinese money, in the One Belt, One Road project.

To whom was the first note of praise for the handling of the pandemic issued, from the head of the United Nations?  The Chinese regime.  The initial creation of the UN was spearheaded by the Rockefeller Empire.

Freedom and liberty will be further stained by the familiar substitute of security.  “Yes, we still have the modified and updated right to assemble and travel and speak our minds, but the principle of limit and caution and common sense should guide our actions, in order to protect the community from new potential epidemics and infections…”

And if the CDC and the World Health Organization decide that a heavy flu season demands lockdowns, in certain hotspots, many people will breathe a sigh of relief and say, “Glad it’s not where I live.  This is nothing compared with the COVID lockdowns…”

In 1970, no US politician would have dreamed of shutting down half of America, including New York and California.  But 50 years later, it was done, with only minor hesitation.  You can fill in the blanks yourself and note what’s changed in the interim.  But certainly, the parade of mini-epidemic ops has helped to tune up the citizenry.  Boil frog slowly, then turn up flame quickly.

As for universal guaranteed income (UGI), it’s not the easiest sell in the world.  But the bridge will be “all those people hurt by the lockdowns.”  Help given, on top of the present welfare programs…channeled into new help programs, and still newer ones, until UGI is a fait accompli.  “We’re all in this together.”  Echoes of the phony, cheap, gold-painted Obama Declaration.  But in order to keep those UGI checks coming, people will have to OBEY.  Cross the street against a red light, park in the wrong space, miss a doctor’s appointment, shoot your mouth off at a local community council meeting, tell your boss at work he’s acting like a little Napoleon, pay your taxes after the deadline, refuse to submit to a medical diagnostic test, and your social credit score will dip.  And that means your monthly government check will undergo an investigation, conducted by an AI algorithm.  Your allotment will drop.  Learn your lesson.

Couldn’t happen here?  Neither could a fake pandemic requiring massive lockdowns and orders not to leave home unless you’re buying toxic medical drugs or food.

In 1987, I started telling people that the medical cartel was the most dangerous of all cartels, long-term.  I saw the covert op called AIDS playing out on the world stage, on the backs of people suffering and dying for reasons that had nothing to with the virus called HIV.  I watched every medical provider fall in line with the official virus story, and I listened to a few of them tell me, off the record, that they knew the science was a rank fraud but there was “nothing they could do.”  They’re falling in line now, too.

When the [worthless] diagnostic tests are fiddled to show that the pandemic is finally declining, everybody and his brother will say the containment measures were responsible for the victory.  The CDC and the World Health Organization will humbly accept pats on the back, and pop champagne corks.

Some people will continue to wear medical masks when they venture outdoors, as a sign of their virtue.  You should stop them on the street and congratulate them.  A large roll of baloney makes a nice gift.

Despite what I’m writing in this article, Doom is not foretold, except for those who want it.  The future is not written.  Voices, especially when they reach a large number, are heard.

I expect technology to be developed that can perform all sorts of new tricks involving remote sensing of humans’ vis-a-vis their state of health—far more sophisticated than registering body temperature.  The sensing [and the diagnosing] will be modeled on the same sort of fraudulent basis as present-day versions in doctors’ offices and hospitals when it comes to germ indicators and contagion.  Even remote sensing of “mental health indicators” will come into play.  All sold as share-and-care protection of the community.

Something like this will appear on the news: “It’s emerged that the mall shooter, who killed 26 people last week, had missed three appointments with a doctor, and had ignored the CDC sensor unit that remotely diagnosed him with Bipolar Disorder.  Authorities are investigating the AI red flag, to see whether the system had malfunctioned.  Dr. Henry Posh, of the CDC, warned that some systems are still not online, because states are waiting on federal grants for funding…”

Of course, the shooter had missed no appointments.  He was a drug addict who had been turned into a walking time bomb by psyop specialists.  He was supposed to go off and thus provide a cautionary tale about the need for medical obedience.

What CDC/WHO really want is a fake epidemic in which the chimerical virus is said to affect brain function.  That’s the Holy Grail.  Then words and thoughts will constitute de facto diagnostic evidence.  “If you find yourself thinking A, B, or C, call 911.”  The authorities realize they’ll have to lead up to it.  We’re not quite there.  Yet.

In the new mythos, everyone is suffering from some disease or disorder at all times.  It’s just a matter of diagnosis and treatment.  —end of March excerpt

Rebellion is in order.  Complete resistance to this future.  What does that mean?  It means many things.  Support of sheriffs and other law-enforcement personnel who know the score and refuse to go along with lockdowns and other fascist measures.  Rallies, protests.

Finding a way to go back to work.  To re-open businesses.  To forge new businesses.  To engage in trade and barter.  To bust the lockdown bubbles.

Spreading information by any means possible.  Information about what’s actually going on.  About the scientific fakery.

It means lawsuits against lockdowns and mandated vaccines all around the world.

It means, for some people, giving up their no-hope attitude.

For some people, it means stopping flailing around and pretending they have no idea what to do.

It means putting freedom over and above control.

It means individuals imagining and then implementing strategies they’ve never thought of before.

It means exposing disguises posing as solutions which are really elements of tyranny.

IT MEANS ALL THE THINGS YOU KNOW IT MEANS.

Jon Rappoport reports: A new May 4, 2021 report by independent researcher, Virginia Stoner, reveals US vaccine-death figures. The report is titled“The Deadly Covid-19 Vaccine Coverup.”
Stoner uses the US government’s own numbers. Here are key quotes from her report:
“There has been a massive increase in deaths reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) this year. That’s not a ‘conspiracy theory’, that’s an indisputable fact.”
“We’re talking about a huge and unprecedented increase—so massive that in the last 4 months alone, VAERS has received over 40% of all death reports it has ever received in its entire 30+year history.”
“The increase in VAERS death reports is not due to more vaccination.”
“Most recently, the death count went from 2794 on April 5, to 3005 on April 12, to 3848 on April 26….1054 deaths in 21 days.”
“One hypothesis…is that the elderly and infirm, many in long-term care facilities, were the first to be targeted by the COVID-19 vaccine campaign, and they are much more likely to die coincidentally. These coincidental deaths then lead to an increase in suspected vaccine-induced deaths reported to VAERS.”
“VAERS data just does not support that hypothesis. First, because all age groups—not just seniors—had a dramatic increase in VAERS death reports from COVID-19 vaccines…Across the board, all age groups experienced a dramatic increase in deaths reported to VAERS from the COVID-19 shots—even the under 18 group, which has had very few COVID-19 shots (so far).”
Stoner constructs a chart showing reported deaths from vaccinations in years prior to COVID, and deaths reported so far from COVID vaccines.
For prior years, we’re talking about roughly 100 deaths a year from somewhere between 250 million and 350 million vaccines administered. On the other hand, we’re talking about 3800 deaths from about 150 million COVID shots—not in a full year; in only four months.
The experts would say neither death figure (100 or 3800) is alarming, given the huge number of vaccines administered. But this is a deception.
Over the years, much has been written (even in the mainstream) about what sits behind REPORTED vaccine injuries and deaths. Estimates of TRUE injury numbers range from 10 to 100 times greater than the reported figures.
3800 reported deaths from COVID vaccines would skyrocket when you estimated the true figure.
As Stoner points out in her report, public health officials, in Orwellian fashion, keep repeating, “The vaccine is safe and effective.” A straightforward analysis of their own numbers completely contradicts their stance.
Likewise, the mainstream press, politicians, corporations, and celebrities are on an all-out push to convince the public that the vaccine is a) necessary and b) a marvel, if only the “hesitant” people would “follow the science” and see the light.
Well, some cults are small; that one is huge.
Virginia Stoner’s report is a stark refutation of the conspiracy theory the cult is promoting.
When the entire population is being subjected to a vast experiment deploying a never-before-released RNA technology; when the shot in the arm is actually a genetic treatment; when the entire field of genetic research is riddled with pretense and lies and alarming miscalculations, leading to ripple effects in overall genetic structures; what else would you expect? 
You would expect exactly what Stoner’s report shows and implies. The COVID vaccine is a building disaster. (Sources for Jon’s article are here.)

IT WAS ALL A PLAN!!!

How much Longer for the “plan”?  Ten years is the luciferin planned answer. In this time, the demon-controlled bankers and their employees (Merkel, Macron, Biden (NOT the “president”) et. al. intend that all economic activity shall be squashed down to the minimum and many, many millions of us shall be dead.

What they expect to gain from this is a world where almost all of us are imprisoned in huge mega-cities with very basic accommodation and the rest of the world shall be their personal fiefdoms. Our function shall be their serfs who are allowed to live just to long as we satisfy their every whim and fancy.

This is not some science-fiction novel, but a determined plan created in the last century. Originally, they expected to achieve their objective by this year. This is why their plan was called “Agenda 21”. As we have proved to be more resilient then expected, they’ve now re-named the project “Agenda 2030” and expect that most of us will be dead by that time.

As you have doubtless seen, their principle tool at the moment is the “Corona” or “Covid-19” fairy tale.

Although this disease is nothing other than the normal annual ‘flu, renamed for propaganda purposes, they have based their campaign upon the fact that almost nobody ever looks at sickness and death statistics. Those of us who do and have looked at such statistics are, of course, aware that nothing out of the ordinary has happened.

To “keep the pot boiling”, every now and then they add a little fuel to the fire. Their latest such is the invention of another new “virus” mutation in England.

There are a number of problems with this:

1. Viruses that do not exist cannot mutate

Nowhere on this earth is there any known laboratory with a specimen of the “virus”. In October and November 2020, 44 governments were asked, under freedom of information legislation, to state where a specimen of the “Covid-19” causing virus is to be found.  31 governments, including the USA, Canada, Great Britain and Australia all answered that they do not have a specimen of the “virus” and do not know of anyone who has. 13 Countries, including Germany, have, illegally, ignored the requests. The only “evidence” that we have about the “virus” is two “photoshopped” images paid for by the demonically possessed Bill Gates. The one was invented by “professor” Drosten at the Charitè teaching hospital in Berlin (not the first time that he has invented a non-existent virus!). The other comes from the Centers for Disease Control in America.

2. The “evidence” for the existence of the “virus” is at best a total fantasy and a worse a complete fraud.

Right around the world, the Polymerase Chain Reaction is used to detect the presence or absence of something called “Sars-Cov-2” (patented for profit against your health) even though both the inventor of the PCR process, Dr. Kerry Mullis, and all manufacturers state that it should NOT be used for diagnostic purposes!

Despite the claim in the legislation which established the new German dictatorship, Sars-Cov-2 is not a virus or anything like one; it is a tiny protein fragment, around one thousand times smaller than a “virus”. It’s genome contains just 37 base pairs (viruses have between 30,000 and 40,000 base pairs). This self-same protein fragment is to be found in more than 100 species of bacteria, mink, goats, lions, even a papaya and SEVENTY-FOUR TIMES in the human genome. A negative PCR test is, therefore, a “false negative” as it has failed to detect normal human proteins! A “positive” PCR test is just as meaningless. DO NOT submit to the PCR test.

3. There is ZERO evidence that a pandemic exists.

There is, actually, no modern precise definition of this term. Looking back in history, we see that the American Centers for Disease Control, used to define it as a condition in which at least 20% of the populations of at least five countries were all sick with the same malady. Using this definition, we see that the last pandemic in Europe took place in the year 1665 – more than three hundred years ago!

An epidemic is defined as a state in which at least one percent of a given population are ill with the same malady.

The Merkel definition is 100 per 100,000 population, i.e. 0.1%; this is far below the epidemic threshold and some thousands of times less than would be needed to call a pandemic.

Bottom Line: DO NOT submit to “the vaccine”. DO NOT submit to mask wearing. DO NOT submit to “social distancing”.  DO NOT submit to so called medical and political and religious “authorities” who want to take your freedoms away.

SLAP THREE – SOCIAL DISTANCING

You’ve got stinky garbage thinking if you’re into social distancing, aka… Lockdown.

Stay away from me.  Keep your distance, please.  Six feet apart, please.

Did you know that full lockdown policies in Western Europe countries have NO evident impacts on the COVID-19 (scam) epidemic? Well, now you do.

This is from the peer-reviewed Emerging Infectious Disease: “We did not find evidence to support a protective effect of personal protective measures or environmental measures in reducing influenza transmission … we did not find evidence of a major effect of hand hygiene on laboratory-confirmed influenza virus transmission.  We did not find evidence that surgical-type face masks are effective in reducing laboratory-confirmed influenza transmission, either when worn by infected persons (source control) or by persons in the general community.”

Social Distancing is Completely Ineffective

The dramatic drop in Covid-19 occurred before lockdowns (social distancing) would have had a chance to have an impact; it would take several weeks for social distancing measures to take effect. “There doesn’t seem to be any correlation between the lockdown and whether or not the epidemic has spread wide and fast.” Why Have We Shut Down the Country?’ Ex-New York Times Reporter Challenges the Dire Coronavirus Models.

Question: What do a goat, a papaya, a bird, and a jackfruit all have in common?

Answer: They ALL tested positive for Covid-19. The president of Tanzania is a rare leader who actually questioned the WHO’s threats of a pandemic. “There is a dirty game played in these tests,” he said. The corona test kits are highly inaccurate – giving lots of false positives

Whose bright idea was this anyway?

Dr. Tony Fauci actually admitted that it was he and Dr. Debbie Birx who told President Trump either he kills the economy or 2.2 million will die. The 2.2 million number was based on an Imperial College (UK) model created by epidemiologist Neil Ferguson who has a history of incorrect predictions. Even though Fauci and Birx later admitted the models were off by MILLIONS they doubled down on their lockdown strategy.

Data manipulation

Doctors began to inflate the numbers of Covid-19 deaths by counting nearly all deaths as Covid-19 deaths.

As a result of data manipulation, a dramatic drop in flu, pneumonia and heart attack deaths occurred. In two weeks’ time they dropped to nearly zero! We can conclude either:

  • Coronavirus cures flu, pneumonia, and heart attacks!
  • Nearly all flu and pneumonia deaths are labeled coronavirus! See the stats at 1:41minutes.

On March 24, US government guidance tells hospitals to list COVID-19 as a cause of death regardless of whether or not there’s testing.

False media reports

Many media reports of young and healthy people dying from Covid-19 turned out to be false:

Stanford epidemiologist warns that coronavirus crackdown is based on bad data

Dr. Ioannidis says that Covid-19 is far less deadly than modelers are assuming; the US fatality rate could be 0.025% – 0.625% which is comparable to that of seasonal flu.

Ioannidis says, “Locking down the world with potentially tremendous social and financial consequences may be totally irrational. It’s like an elephant being attacked by a house cat. Frustrated and trying to avoid the cat, the elephant accidentally jumps off a cliff and dies.”

COVID-19 models are “garbage”

Sean Davis … called out the inaccuracy of models by the University of Washington’s Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation that are used by the White House. Businesses have been destroyed and countless jobs have been lost because of scientific models predicting devastation… those models were “garbage”

Now he tells us?

Fauci says, “You Can’t Really Rely Upon Models.” As it was reported in The Washington Post:

Fauci said, “I’ve looked at all the models. I’ve spent a lot of time on the models. They don’t tell you anything. You can’t really rely upon models.”

Fauci: We need social distancing but sex with a stranger is OK

The disgusting Fauci was asked: “If you’re swiping on a dating app like Tinder, or Bumble or Grindr, and you match with someone that you think is hot, and you’re just kind of like, ‘Maybe it’s fine if this one stranger comes over.’ What do you say to that person?”

“You know that’s tough,” replied the befuddled National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases director to the curveball. “If you’re willing to take a risk – and you know, everybody has their own tolerance for risks – you could figure out if you want to meet somebody,” said Fauci.  News Flash: Fauci & Birx got “fired” by President Trump and replaced by Scott Atlas… Read Jon Rappaport’s brilliant memo to Scott.

Follow the money

Scott Jensen MD, a Minnesota State Senator said he was directed to fill out death certificates with a COVID-19 diagnosis without laboratory confirmation: I received a 7-page document that told me if I had an 86-year-old patient that had pneumonia but was never tested for COVID-19 but sometime after she came down with pneumonia we learned that she had been exposed to her son who had no symptoms but later on was identified with COVID-19, then it would be appropriate to diagnose on the death certificate COVID-19.

[For] a Medicare patient who is diagnosed with simple non-COVID pneumonia … the hospital would receive a one-time Medicare lump-sum payout of $4,600 … if you have a COVID-19 admission to the hospital you’ll get paid $13,000. If that COVID-19 patient goes on a ventilator, you get $39,000; three times as much…. Some hospitals have a pay-share plan with their staff doctors. Therefore, a windfall for the hospital is passed along to those doctors.

How many more states will be forced to backtrack their false stats?

You’ve heard or read about it that a few states are being forced to remove hundreds of deaths from the coronavirus death count stats after honest coroners raised the red flags.

Social Distancing and Suicide

Take a moment to read this tragic side-effect of social distancing.

As you read that article, keep in mind that the “thief” is here to steal, kill and destroy life.  John 10: 10-11, “The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy. I came that they may have life and have it abundantly. I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep.”  The thief is the devil. The good shepherd is The Savior Jesus Christ.

It’s a Plandemic… We’re being set up!

So, there you have it, this entire plandemic with churches, businesses, and schools being forced to close and people wearing toxic masks, and health destroying social distancing was based on a gigantic, tragic mistake by a flawed computer modeling by so-called medical “experts.”

Building on this, research and medical doctors were told to manipulate the data, so it seemed as if there were more deaths from coronavirus than there really were. The doctors were happy to oblige since by diagnosing Covid-19 they were given a lot of money. And it wasn’t too difficult to do that since the testing is inaccurate with a high number of false positives. Then again, maybe all the goats in Tanzania should be quarantined.

Based on “expert” predictions economies were destroyed, millions lost their jobs, unknown numbers of lives were ruined, and unknown numbers of people committed suicide. All because of a “mistake” … or was it? Or was it… “planned”?  Or is it a set up for something far more nefarious?  I believe it is.  Please watch Rob Skiba’s video for biblical proof that it is.

Since 1995, the United Kingdom and Wales has had five flu seasons that were worse than the current coronavirus outbreak. And yet there were no screaming headlines and no lockdowns.

Why were we seeing a pandemic? Because the sheeple were told to. Duh.

It’s sinful human nature to make these kinds of erroneous connections. It’s human nature to

try to make sense out of our lives – and we’ll see whatever we want to see (even believe all the false Covid-19 studies) based on our assumptions and lack of faith in The God of The Bible.

“A horrible pandemic of the kind that’s never been seen before? Ah yes, the sheeple see it now… or maybe the sheeple see a dolphin and a bunny wabbit in the clouds – it all depends on what they want to see.”      SLAP   SLAP   SLAP

Tragically, one of our human frailties is that we’ll see it when we believe it. And the “experts,” the politicians, and the mainstream Marxist media tell the sheeple what to believe and even people in the church are buying it hook, line and sinker.

08/11/2020: Statement from Tucker Carlson… I’m sorry but anyone who thinks that social distancing is a good idea for the next few years, actually wants to be microchipped or thinks that a ‘benevolent’ dictatorship is for the good of humanity, I don’t want to give that point of view any of my energy.

I am a free human being and if you want to stay home, stay home. That’s your sovereign right to choose.

If you want to wear a mask, wear a mask. That is your sovereign right to choose.

If you want to avoid large crowds, avoid large crowds. That’s your sovereign right to choose.

I am not required to descend into poverty for YOU.

I am not required to abstain from human contact for YOU.

I refuse to participate in “quarantine life” until there’s an unsafe, untested vaccine released in eighteen months.

I refuse to receive a vaccine to make others feel safer because that is MY sovereign right to choose!

If you’re convinced the vaccine is safe and effective, you can get it yourself.

Some of you are allowing fear and policies devoid of scientifically accurate data to destroy the country you live in and ruin your life.

We have a constitutional right to take risks. Life is full of bacteria and viruses, many of which spread before symptoms manifest and after they subside.

We have a sovereign right to receive OR refuse vaccines.

The data was inaccurate at best; purposely overblown to justify government overreaction at worst.

Stop allowing the government to destroy:

The food supply;

Small businesses;

Medical autonomy;

Access to healthcare;

Mass gatherings;

Privacy rights;

Our mental health & freedom

When the “new normal” is filled with starvation, depression, suicide, child abuse, domestic violence, imprisonment, governmental spying, and pure DESPERATION, the “virus” is going to look preferable to the world you helped facilitate.

I’m going to turn this around on people from now on. Those who say I’m (or anyone that supports this) are putting money over lives by wanting the country back open for business, hear this:

-YOU don’t care about the people who will kill themselves out of hopelessness.

-YOU don’t care about small businesses that’ll close their doors (THEIR LIVELIHOOD) permanently.

-YOU don’t care about the children/women/men who will be victims of domestic abuse.

-YOU don’t care about people defaulting on their mortgages.

-YOU don’t care about bills going unpaid by families with ZERO income right now.

-YOU don’t care about people wondering where their next meal will come from.

-YOU don’t care about the people who will lose their sobriety and slip back into alcoholism.

-YOU don’t care about the people who will starve.

-YOU support the inevitable looting that’ll take place.

-YOU don’t care about anyone who is murdered the longer this shutdown goes on.

-YOU don’t care about people’s mental health.

-YOU don’t care about the children who DO need teachers and educators to guide & educate them

-YOU don’t care about the economy crashing down around us

-YOU DON’T CARE.

-YOU love your shackles.

-YOU are pathetic, begging your leaders for MORE shut down and MORE regulations and MORE handouts.

I will NOT tolerate another person telling me that I don’t care about lives.

I care about the situation in its entirety.

But YOU don’t care about any of that so…

YOU stay home.

YOU wear a mask.

YOU live in fear.

I on the other hand will not as is my sovereign right to choose NOT TO!

This was sent to me by an attorney friend who received it from a nurse of 30 years: “Do you remember last spring when the media convinced nearly EVERYONE that the positive COVID case numbers flashing on every news screen 24/7 should cause you to panic?  I argued at the time that the number of cases in isolation was irrelevant – that only the death rate gave us a valid perspective of the risk factor.  Still, to this day the public focus is entirely on the number of cases so let’s take a moment and look at these case numbers from the perspective of feeling sick and dying because that’s the source of your fear, isn’t it?

The number of COVID19 cases nationwide as of September 8, 2020 is 6,287,362 (let’s call it 6.3 million.)   According to the CDC, 40% of those 6.3 million people DON’T FEEL SICK.  Time magazine reports the asymptomatic number as 81%.   So anywhere between 2.5 million to 5 million people who demonstrate a lab-documented infection FEEL fine.

That leaves 1.3 to 3.8 million people who feel sick.  We are told that there have been 188,688 deaths in the US from COVID19.  I haven’t heard of a single asymptomatic case that has died so presumably that leaves 1.1 to 3.6 million people who were sick with COVID but not sick enough to die.

In 2018-2019, we had a moderately severe flu season with the CDC models reporting that 35.5 million people had symptomatic flu illness (asymptomatic flu cases were not counted since the gold standard for a Pre-COVID19 viral diagnosis was symptoms.)  Nevertheless, that leaves us 35.5 MILLION cases of flu compared to 1.1 to 3.6 million cases of symptomatic, non-lethal COVID19.

Let that sink in. The rate of symptomatic lab documented COVID cases in this country is 90-97% LESS than the rate of flu in a moderately severe flu year.  Are you beginning to understand the sham here?  Stop freaking out about the number of cases among the less vulnerable who for the most part don’t even know they have COVID.  Those numbers are relevant only for a media-driven–feeding-frenzy. This is NOT the plague.  The preponderance of asymptomatic or mild-to-moderate cases creates herd immunity, which was a principle of public health for over 100 years—or at least until last March when COVID19 models created this media monster.”

Bottom Line

This illegal, irrational, horrible, terrible, murderous, demonic so called “pandemic” is absolutely no worse than a seasonal flu! And yet most people got (and are getting) conned by little Napoleon-complexed dudes hiding inside white lab coats who made guesses based on a flawed model to shut down the entire earth… for what?  Really?  SLAP… wake up people!

Wake up Church!!! Wake up Pastors!!!

RESIST the coming horrors of the vaccine (or any vaccine)!

RESIST wearing the toxic, submissive, life-robbing masks!

RESIST the depression and isolation of social distancing!

RESIST the evil socialist, globalist, liberal, Marxist, fascist democrat’s agenda!!!

RESIST the fake news of the mainstream Marxist media!

RESIST anyone insisting that they are the only ones who know what’s best for your health!

RESIST becoming or being a sheeple led by the falseness of the world.

HUMBLY submit ONLY to the Word of God – our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.