Site icon For God's Glory Alone Ministries

American Values, End of Day, with Gary Bauer: “Fundamental Misjudgment”; Post Pans Pact; Democrats Demand A Say; Sleeper Issue: Illegal Immigration; Rand Paul Jumps In

Tuesday, April 7, 2015

From: Gary L. Bauer

“Fundamental Misjudgment”

During an interview with National Public Radio this morning, President Obama attempted to explain why he opposes linking the Iranian nuclear deal to formal recognition of Israel’s right to exist. Obama said:

 

“The notion that we could condition Iran not getting nuclear weapons . . . on Iran recognizing Israel is really akin to saying that we won’t sign a deal unless the nature of the Iranian regime completely transforms. And that is, I think, a fundamental misjudgment. . . . We want Iran not to have nuclear weapons precisely because we can’t bank on the nature of the regime changing.”


Obama just admitted that the Iranian regime is so radical there is no chance it would ever concede the right of Israel to exist. He is right, of course. This regime promises another Holocaust after all.

Given that, how can Obama or anyone else trust that regime to keep its promises in a nuclear deal, even if the deal were good, which it isn’t?

In what world does this make any sense?

Post Pans Pact

Yesterday I noted how some media outlets were commenting on the concessions President Obama made to Iran just to get it to keep talking about its nuclear program. Underscoring that concern, the Washington Post editorial board also blasted the deal, writing that the details announced last week “fall well short of the goals originally set by the Obama administration” in 2012.

The Post editors continued:

 

“None of Iran’s nuclear facilities — including the Fordow center buried under a mountain — will be closed. Not one of the country’s 19,000 centrifuges will be dismantled. . . . In effect, Iran’s nuclear infrastructure will remain intact. . . . When the accord lapses, the Islamic Republic will instantly become a threshold nuclear state.”


Even Obama acknowledges this. In the same interview with National Public Radio, Obama admits that “in Year 13, 14, 15, they have advanced centrifuges that enrich uranium fairly rapidly, and at that point, the breakout times would have shrunk almost down to zero.” His deal, at best, buys us time and nothing more.

The Washington Post editors concluded their column by urging the White House to recognize “Congress’s legitimate prerogative to review” the deal. And they added, “We hope Mr. Obama will make as much effort to engage in good faith with skeptical allies and domestic critics as he has with the Iranian regime.”

Democrats Demand A Say

Not all of the president’s “domestic critics” are conservatives. Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY) is joining his Republican colleagues in supporting legislation authored by Senator Bob Corker (R-TN) that requires congressional review of any deal with Iran.

Schumer’s support of the Corker bill is important because he is already a member of the Democratic leadership team. Moreover, it is widely assumed that he will succeed Harry Reid as the Senate Democratic leader in 2017.

With Schumer on board, nine Senate Democrats are now co-sponsoring the Corker bill, which may be just one vote away from the 67 needed to override a veto.

Sleeper Issue: Illegal Immigration

Amid reports that a new surge of illegal immigration is now hitting our southern border comes a new Rasmussen poll finding that large majorities of voters are frustrated with Obama’s quasi-amnesty and other so-called “magnet” policies.

According to the poll:

 

 

Exit mobile version